Conventional retirement advice has a golden rule: delay Social Security as long as you can, because the monthly check grows every year you wait. But a strategy gaining traction among wealthier couples adds a clever twist — spend down the 401(k) first in the early 60s, precisely so they can let Social Security grow untouched until 70. It sounds backwards. It isn’t.
How the strategy works
The mechanics, as described in recent reporting, go like this: a couple retires around age 63 and covers their living expenses by drawing down their 401(k) and other savings. That income bridge lets them delay claiming Social Security until 70, when the benefit is at its maximum — potentially reaching around $5,100 a month for a high earner.
Because Social Security benefits grow roughly 8% per year for each year you delay past full retirement age (up to 70), waiting can permanently boost that monthly, inflation-adjusted, government-guaranteed income for the rest of your life.
Why it can make sense
There are a few reasons this appeals to affluent households:
- A bigger guaranteed floor — Social Security is one of the few sources of lifetime, inflation-adjusted income. Maximizing it is like buying a very generous annuity, and it’s especially valuable if you live a long time.
- Longevity insurance — the delay pays off most for people who expect to live well into their 80s or beyond, which wealthier, healthier retirees often do.
- Tax and RMD management — drawing down the 401(k) earlier can reduce the balance subject to future required minimum distributions, potentially smoothing out the tax hit later in retirement.
The catches
This isn’t a universal playbook, and the “wealthy couples” framing matters. Spending your 401(k) at 63 only works if you have enough saved to comfortably bridge seven years without Social Security. For many households, that’s simply not feasible — and claiming earlier is the right, necessary choice.
The math also depends on longevity. If someone claims late but doesn’t live long enough to collect those larger checks for many years, the delay can underperform claiming earlier. And decisions around retirement accounts carry their own traps — for example, 401(k) rollovers can be costly and irreversible if done carelessly, with hidden fees and tax consequences.
The broader lesson
Even if you’re not in the position to run this exact strategy, the underlying principle is useful for everyone: the order in which you tap your income sources in retirement can matter as much as how much you saved. Coordinating withdrawals, taxes, and the Social Security claiming decision is where a lot of hidden value — or hidden cost — lives.
The bottom line
Spending the 401(k) first to supersize Social Security is a smart move for couples who can afford the bridge — a way to lock in a larger, guaranteed, inflation-protected income for life. For everyone else, the takeaway is simpler: claiming and withdrawal timing is a real lever, and it’s worth planning deliberately rather than by default.
This article is for general information only and does not constitute financial, tax, or retirement advice. Everyone’s situation is different — consult a licensed financial professional before making decisions about Social Security, 401(k)s, or withdrawals.
Get the next Top Stock Pick in your inbox — free.
